Welcome to The Hand Lettering Forum!
This is an interactive Bulletin Board on the topics of Sign making, design, fabrication, History, old Books and of coarse Letterheads, Keepers of the craft. The Hand Lettering Forum features links to resources, sign art history, techniques, and artists profiles. Learn more about Letterheads at https://theletterheads.com. Below you'll see Mchat has been added as a live communication portal for trial, and the Main forum Links are listed below.
This is an interactive Bulletin Board on the topics of Sign making, design, fabrication, History, old Books and of coarse Letterheads, Keepers of the craft. The Hand Lettering Forum features links to resources, sign art history, techniques, and artists profiles. Learn more about Letterheads at https://theletterheads.com. Below you'll see Mchat has been added as a live communication portal for trial, and the Main forum Links are listed below.
Design Critique
Moderators: Ron Percell, Mike Jackson, Danny Baronian
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
Design Critique
Hello all,
I sure could use some feedback on this design. It would be a concrete block structure covered with cultured stone. There would be a sandblasted HDU panel, Carved HDU letters with a fade. The secondary copy would be gilded and the 3D "gears" would be router-carved and gilded.
The monument would be about 15' x 7'.
Thanks for the help
Wayne
I sure could use some feedback on this design. It would be a concrete block structure covered with cultured stone. There would be a sandblasted HDU panel, Carved HDU letters with a fade. The secondary copy would be gilded and the 3D "gears" would be router-carved and gilded.
The monument would be about 15' x 7'.
Thanks for the help
Wayne
- Attachments
-
- Untitled.jpg (28.22 KiB) Viewed 9757 times
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 6:41 pm
- Location: Estes Park, CO
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
Overall effect is nice but I must be too far away as I cannot make out the secondary copy from here.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
Thanks Ken,
The finished monument would be about 15' 4" long so in order to shrink it down enough, the secondary copy looks pixelated. Ir would really be about 3.5 to 4" high and would only need to be read as the customer pulls into the driveway. THe "S" in "Signworks" would be about 23"
Thanks
The finished monument would be about 15' 4" long so in order to shrink it down enough, the secondary copy looks pixelated. Ir would really be about 3.5 to 4" high and would only need to be read as the customer pulls into the driveway. THe "S" in "Signworks" would be about 23"
Thanks
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
It says "signs work for your business"
What do you think?
What do you think?
-
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 6:41 pm
- Location: Estes Park, CO
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
My point was that while I understand one being able to read the secondary copy while close, your message is important to set you apart from the rest of us. At 4" in gold it should be readable at 30 feet but I would like to see it have more impact at say 100 feet. I guess it depends upon traffic and its speed. Just my opinion though.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
Thanks Ken,
There'a enough negative space there. I'll try putting it on two lines and increasing the size, when I get back to work Monday. I appreciate the help.
There'a enough negative space there. I'll try putting it on two lines and increasing the size, when I get back to work Monday. I appreciate the help.
Re: Design Critique
My first glance impression is that while the main copy has enough contrast with the blue background, where it overlaps on the stone there is much less. Could be a source of readability problems, depending how fast traffic moves and how much visual competition it has to deal with.
My thought for the tagline: "Signs That Work"
My thought for the tagline: "Signs That Work"
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:03 pm
- Location: Frisco, Co
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
Cam has a point with the main copy 'Signworks'. I think a black outline
would fix it though. "Signs That Work", great tagline, I'd run with it.
Mark
would fix it though. "Signs That Work", great tagline, I'd run with it.
Mark
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 11:18 am
- Location: Milwaukee
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
After looking at this design a few times, I feel that the shape of the blue panel is wrong for the shape of the structure. Its panel is too vertical. Try using a shape that is more horizontal. As Cam stated, the contrast between the structure and the lettering is too similar. Try keeping the Lettering inside a revised horizontal blue panel.
By making the panel more horizontal you will also be able to increase the size of your tag line.
By doing a few more layouts, you may find a combination that works.
Sometimes you have to walk away from your layouts and come back to them a day or so later.
By looking at them again with fresh eyes, you may see something you did not see before.
RMN
By making the panel more horizontal you will also be able to increase the size of your tag line.
By doing a few more layouts, you may find a combination that works.
Sometimes you have to walk away from your layouts and come back to them a day or so later.
By looking at them again with fresh eyes, you may see something you did not see before.
RMN
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 11:38 pm
- Location: springfield, or.
- Contact:
Re: Design Critique
I have the perfect resolve........as Mark suggested, add a heavy outline.....then cut the bottom of your main panel following the outline. That's the main sign panel. Under that main panel add another panel for your tag line, a panel as long as the first stage of stone. See how that might look